<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>friends.praxeme &#187; Praxeme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friends.praxeme.org/tag/praxeme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friends.praxeme.org</link>
	<description>We love cheesecake...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Méfiez-vous des imitations [fr]</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2011/02/mefiez-vous-des-imitations-fr/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2011/02/mefiez-vous-des-imitations-fr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-mindedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Le Praxeme Institute respecte quelques principes forts dans ses travaux et Praxeme est l&#8217;expression même de ces principes. Au coeur de notre reflexion est la rigueur. Certains pourront trouver à redire à cette ambition qui peut être perçue comme désuète et old fashion. Ce serait oublier que nos systèmes aujourd&#8217;hui sont souvent au point de [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2011/02/mefiez-vous-des-imitations-fr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PxFAQ: How Can I Contribute?</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/pxfaq-how-can-i-contribute/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/pxfaq-how-can-i-contribute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 18:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remind you all that Praxeme is an Open Initiative and ***needs you***. You can contribute in a number of ways: Take a responsibility in one of the domains Praxeme is lacking material, and either produce material or manage a work-group to produce it. This activity requires to have a rather good understanding of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/pxfaq-how-can-i-contribute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PxFAQ &#8211; Why are CRUD operations generaly located in Set Business Logical Machines?</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/pxfaq-why-are-crud-operations-generaly-located-in-set-business-logical-machines/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/pxfaq-why-are-crud-operations-generaly-located-in-set-business-logical-machines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logical Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related questions: Why separate Elementary and Set machines/operations? Would it be interesting to add a CRUD Business Logical Machine next to the Elementary and Set ones? It is clear that we are considering things in the Logical Aspect and that no justifications will come from Technical Aspect. First shot CRUD operations are not high level [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/pxfaq-why-are-crud-operations-generaly-located-in-set-business-logical-machines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Praxeme and Complex Systems</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/praxeme-and-complex-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/praxeme-and-complex-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>YvesC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a follow-up to a conversation that started during the meeting of the &#8220;Collège des contributeurs&#8221; last week. Although I do not have the time to post a proper discussion, I&#8217;ll start with a few headlines to &#8220;get the ball rolling&#8221; : start a discussion. Hence I&#8217;ll use an &#8220;outine style&#8221; and leave the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/praxeme-and-complex-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PxFAQ: What is this strange thing called Logical Aspect?</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-is-this-strange-thing-called-logical-aspect/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-is-this-strange-thing-called-logical-aspect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise System Topology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logical Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related questions: Can we use upstream models directly in implementations? What is the interest of the Logical Aspect if I want to build an SOA? We put important efforts in upstream aspects, can we make some savings in the logical one? The logical aspect is sometimes considered useless and we hear some people willing to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-is-this-strange-thing-called-logical-aspect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PxFAQ: What are the services we *need*?</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-are-the-services-we-need/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-are-the-services-we-need/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related questions: How to find them? How to assert that they are the right ones? How to respect the decoupling principle? By giving clear procedures to deduce services from business inputs, Praxeme solves the problem of finding the right services in the only available way: changing intuition only procedures to analytic thinking. By structuring precisely [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-are-the-services-we-need/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An un-designed law</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/03/an-un-designed-law/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/03/an-un-designed-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ergonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here and everywhere Here in France we have to face a very dangerous bill [fr] that may break some fundamental principles of the internet. It is a quick and dirty answer to those who claim that exchanging files on the net would lead (and in fact would have led) to big losses for music and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/03/an-un-designed-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

