<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>friends.praxeme &#187; Logical Aspect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friends.praxeme.org/tag/logicalaspect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friends.praxeme.org</link>
	<description>We love cheesecake...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Unfinished Conversation Concept in Maemo 5</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/the-unfinished-conversation-concept-in-maemo-5/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/the-unfinished-conversation-concept-in-maemo-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 17:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logical Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Business Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantic Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Aspect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maemo 5 Maemo is the framework used in Nokia Internet tablets since the N770, and today in the N900 phone which combines a cellular phone and an Internet tablet. Though I&#8217;m very found of this little thing that starts to look like the Star Trek communicator I wanted when I was a kid (except for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/the-unfinished-conversation-concept-in-maemo-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PxFAQ &#8211; Why are CRUD operations generaly located in Set Business Logical Machines?</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/pxfaq-why-are-crud-operations-generaly-located-in-set-business-logical-machines/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/pxfaq-why-are-crud-operations-generaly-located-in-set-business-logical-machines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logical Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related questions: Why separate Elementary and Set machines/operations? Would it be interesting to add a CRUD Business Logical Machine next to the Elementary and Set ones? It is clear that we are considering things in the Logical Aspect and that no justifications will come from Technical Aspect. First shot CRUD operations are not high level [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/pxfaq-why-are-crud-operations-generaly-located-in-set-business-logical-machines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PxFAQ: What is this strange thing called Logical Aspect?</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-is-this-strange-thing-called-logical-aspect/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-is-this-strange-thing-called-logical-aspect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise System Topology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logical Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related questions: Can we use upstream models directly in implementations? What is the interest of the Logical Aspect if I want to build an SOA? We put important efforts in upstream aspects, can we make some savings in the logical one? The logical aspect is sometimes considered useless and we hear some people willing to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-is-this-strange-thing-called-logical-aspect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

