<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>friends.praxeme &#187; design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friends.praxeme.org/tag/design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friends.praxeme.org</link>
	<description>We love cheesecake...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Unfinished Conversation Concept in Maemo 5</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/the-unfinished-conversation-concept-in-maemo-5/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/the-unfinished-conversation-concept-in-maemo-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 17:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logical Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Business Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantic Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Aspect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maemo 5 Maemo is the framework used in Nokia Internet tablets since the N770, and today in the N900 phone which combines a cellular phone and an Internet tablet. Though I&#8217;m very found of this little thing that starts to look like the Star Trek communicator I wanted when I was a kid (except for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/the-unfinished-conversation-concept-in-maemo-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PxFAQ &#8211; Why are CRUD operations generaly located in Set Business Logical Machines?</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/pxfaq-why-are-crud-operations-generaly-located-in-set-business-logical-machines/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/pxfaq-why-are-crud-operations-generaly-located-in-set-business-logical-machines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logical Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related questions: Why separate Elementary and Set machines/operations? Would it be interesting to add a CRUD Business Logical Machine next to the Elementary and Set ones? It is clear that we are considering things in the Logical Aspect and that no justifications will come from Technical Aspect. First shot CRUD operations are not high level [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/pxfaq-why-are-crud-operations-generaly-located-in-set-business-logical-machines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Praxeme and Complex Systems</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/praxeme-and-complex-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/praxeme-and-complex-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>YvesC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a follow-up to a conversation that started during the meeting of the &#8220;Collège des contributeurs&#8221; last week. Although I do not have the time to post a proper discussion, I&#8217;ll start with a few headlines to &#8220;get the ball rolling&#8221; : start a discussion. Hence I&#8217;ll use an &#8220;outine style&#8221; and leave the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/praxeme-and-complex-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PxFAQ: What is this strange thing called Logical Aspect?</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-is-this-strange-thing-called-logical-aspect/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-is-this-strange-thing-called-logical-aspect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise System Topology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logical Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related questions: Can we use upstream models directly in implementations? What is the interest of the Logical Aspect if I want to build an SOA? We put important efforts in upstream aspects, can we make some savings in the logical one? The logical aspect is sometimes considered useless and we hear some people willing to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-is-this-strange-thing-called-logical-aspect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PxFAQ: What are the services we *need*?</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-are-the-services-we-need/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-are-the-services-we-need/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related questions: How to find them? How to assert that they are the right ones? How to respect the decoupling principle? By giving clear procedures to deduce services from business inputs, Praxeme solves the problem of finding the right services in the only available way: changing intuition only procedures to analytic thinking. By structuring precisely [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-are-the-services-we-need/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BPM and SOA</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/09/bpm-and-soa/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/09/bpm-and-soa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process & BPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We see more and more attention on relations between SOA and other parts of IT, with important questions like the one raised in the following blog post: http://www.jpmorgenthal.com/morgenthal/?p=103. Relations between SOA and BPM is like relations between bass guitar and drums. They live separately and have their own rules, but they can produce great music [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/09/bpm-and-soa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security is a strategic concern</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/security-is-a-strategic-concern/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/security-is-a-strategic-concern/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[References]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is an interesting point of view on security business today from an IBM Security Strategist: http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/081709-8-dirty-secrets-of-the.html Among the eight points some are tightly related to enterprise strategy and enterprise architecture. Points 2, 6 and 7 focus on external concerns, regulations and security product vendors, but  others may be summarized like this: what do I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/security-is-a-strategic-concern/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get out of the immaturity model (part 2)</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/get-out-of-the-immaturity-model-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/get-out-of-the-immaturity-model-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blueprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-mindedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationaliztion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Part 1] Here are some points to focus on to try to get out of the immaturity model. Some are obvious. Some may sound like weird ideas. But do not underestimate culture: obvious points may not be obvious for everyone and weird things may well be weird only for those who see them for the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/get-out-of-the-immaturity-model-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get out of the immaturity model (part 1)</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/get-out-of-the-immaturity-model-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/get-out-of-the-immaturity-model-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blueprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-mindedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationaliztion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;IT is a young discipline&#8221; syndrome For as long as I have worked in IT I have heard this dogmatic explanation. It is used for all sorts of issues ranging from hardware failures to heavily bugged software including huge and astonishingly complex IT solutions without strong relations with business problems. Each time, the maturity idea [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/get-out-of-the-immaturity-model-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movies errors, a wish list</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/03/movies-errors-a-wish-list/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/03/movies-errors-a-wish-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lately I re-read a list of errors about computers [fr+en] (sorry for English readers, items are in English but comments are in French) found in movies. It&#8217;s not exactly the first time I&#8217;ve read such a list and it&#8217;s always amusing to see a collection of problems movie makers do about our domain, but this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/03/movies-errors-a-wish-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An un-designed law</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/03/an-un-designed-law/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/03/an-un-designed-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ergonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here and everywhere Here in France we have to face a very dangerous bill [fr] that may break some fundamental principles of the internet. It is a quick and dirty answer to those who claim that exchanging files on the net would lead (and in fact would have led) to big losses for music and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/03/an-un-designed-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Desktop Application for Little Devices</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2008/10/desktop-application-for-little-devices/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2008/10/desktop-application-for-little-devices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free & Open]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.info/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Praxeme Compliant Project Proposal In Praxeme document collection, lies a course with a case study about Application or Services a very little device like PDA or Netbook could present to give a very enjoyable user experience. Simple ideas may be great ideas and it&#8217;s the case here: the concept of many applications to manage [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2008/10/desktop-application-for-little-devices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

