<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>friends.praxeme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friends.praxeme.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friends.praxeme.org</link>
	<description>We love cheesecake...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Méfiez-vous des imitations [fr]</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2011/02/mefiez-vous-des-imitations-fr/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2011/02/mefiez-vous-des-imitations-fr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-mindedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Le Praxeme Institute respecte quelques principes forts dans ses travaux et Praxeme est l&#8217;expression même de ces principes. Au coeur de notre reflexion est la rigueur. Certains pourront trouver à redire à cette ambition qui peut être perçue comme désuète et old fashion. Ce serait oublier que nos systèmes aujourd&#8217;hui sont souvent au point de [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2011/02/mefiez-vous-des-imitations-fr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raw data may not be enough</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2011/02/raw-data-may-not-be-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2011/02/raw-data-may-not-be-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Business Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantic Aspect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very interesting thought about mental models in companies and administrations : http://blog.business-ecology.org/2011/02/business-ecology-for-customer-connections.html In all cases depicted by the author, raw data are important, either as a starting point or as a final concern. This is also related to the huge growth a volumes available from the inside and from the outside. Today some amazing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2011/02/raw-data-may-not-be-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New UIs need semantic approache and Open Business Concepts</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/07/new-uis-need-semantic-approache-and-open-business-concepts/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/07/new-uis-need-semantic-approache-and-open-business-concepts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Great Talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Business Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantic Aspect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past months I&#8217;ve seen amazing demos of futur UI devices that are studied and prototyped in labs. The last one was this one, very impressive because it mimics nearly exactly the UI found in the movie Minority Report which became a must-have for a lot of geeks *and* non-geeks. http://www.ted.com/talks/john_underkoffler_drive_3d_data_with_a_gesture.html This one is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/07/new-uis-need-semantic-approache-and-open-business-concepts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IT Projects failures and Risk Management</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/06/it-projects-failures-and-risk-management/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/06/it-projects-failures-and-risk-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 00:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Masters of Disaster Here is a very enlightening paper from Wharton&#8217;s Risk Management and Decision Processes Center: http://www.whartonmagazine.com/issues/815.php IT projects fall in the same behavior: Quote: &#8220;a psychological bias toward short-term maximization instead of long-term planning—a psychological bias all humans share&#8221;. IT Project: short ROIs, code before design and architecture, intuition instead of analytical thinking, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/06/it-projects-failures-and-risk-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Unfinished Conversation Concept in Maemo 5</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/the-unfinished-conversation-concept-in-maemo-5/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/the-unfinished-conversation-concept-in-maemo-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 17:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logical Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Business Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantic Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Aspect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maemo 5 Maemo is the framework used in Nokia Internet tablets since the N770, and today in the N900 phone which combines a cellular phone and an Internet tablet. Though I&#8217;m very found of this little thing that starts to look like the Star Trek communicator I wanted when I was a kid (except for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/the-unfinished-conversation-concept-in-maemo-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About Sir Ken Robinson talk &#8220;Bring on the learning revolution!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/sir-ken-robinson-bring-on-the-learning-revolution/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/sir-ken-robinson-bring-on-the-learning-revolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 23:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Great Talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An amazing, and funny, TED talk from Feb 2010 &#8220;Innovation is hard because it means doing something that people don&#8217;t find very easy for the most part. It means challenging what we take for granted, things that we think are obvious. The great problem for reform or transformation is the tirany of common sense. [...] [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/sir-ken-robinson-bring-on-the-learning-revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PxFAQ: How Can I Contribute?</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/pxfaq-how-can-i-contribute/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/pxfaq-how-can-i-contribute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 18:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remind you all that Praxeme is an Open Initiative and ***needs you***. You can contribute in a number of ways: Take a responsibility in one of the domains Praxeme is lacking material, and either produce material or manage a work-group to produce it. This activity requires to have a rather good understanding of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/pxfaq-how-can-i-contribute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wiki: a powerful tool for scoping aspect</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/wiki-a-powerful-tool-for-scoping-aspect/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/wiki-a-powerful-tool-for-scoping-aspect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 16:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scoping Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See notes at the end of the post Scoping The scoping aspect (also known as politics aspect) is the pre-modeling concern before real modeling efforts of the upstream aspects (semantic, pragmatic and geographic). This is where we gather all raw material from very diverse sources including (but not limited to) enterprise and business strategies, business [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2010/05/wiki-a-powerful-tool-for-scoping-aspect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PxFAQ &#8211; Why are CRUD operations generaly located in Set Business Logical Machines?</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/pxfaq-why-are-crud-operations-generaly-located-in-set-business-logical-machines/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/pxfaq-why-are-crud-operations-generaly-located-in-set-business-logical-machines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logical Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related questions: Why separate Elementary and Set machines/operations? Would it be interesting to add a CRUD Business Logical Machine next to the Elementary and Set ones? It is clear that we are considering things in the Logical Aspect and that no justifications will come from Technical Aspect. First shot CRUD operations are not high level [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/pxfaq-why-are-crud-operations-generaly-located-in-set-business-logical-machines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Praxeme and Complex Systems</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/praxeme-and-complex-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/praxeme-and-complex-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>YvesC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a follow-up to a conversation that started during the meeting of the &#8220;Collège des contributeurs&#8221; last week. Although I do not have the time to post a proper discussion, I&#8217;ll start with a few headlines to &#8220;get the ball rolling&#8221; : start a discussion. Hence I&#8217;ll use an &#8220;outine style&#8221; and leave the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/11/praxeme-and-complex-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PxFAQ: What is this strange thing called Logical Aspect?</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-is-this-strange-thing-called-logical-aspect/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-is-this-strange-thing-called-logical-aspect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise System Topology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logical Aspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related questions: Can we use upstream models directly in implementations? What is the interest of the Logical Aspect if I want to build an SOA? We put important efforts in upstream aspects, can we make some savings in the logical one? The logical aspect is sometimes considered useless and we hear some people willing to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-is-this-strange-thing-called-logical-aspect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PxFAQ: What are the services we *need*?</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-are-the-services-we-need/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-are-the-services-we-need/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praxeme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related questions: How to find them? How to assert that they are the right ones? How to respect the decoupling principle? By giving clear procedures to deduce services from business inputs, Praxeme solves the problem of finding the right services in the only available way: changing intuition only procedures to analytic thinking. By structuring precisely [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/10/pxfaq-what-are-the-services-we-need/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BPM and SOA</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/09/bpm-and-soa/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/09/bpm-and-soa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PxFAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process & BPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We see more and more attention on relations between SOA and other parts of IT, with important questions like the one raised in the following blog post: http://www.jpmorgenthal.com/morgenthal/?p=103. Relations between SOA and BPM is like relations between bass guitar and drums. They live separately and have their own rules, but they can produce great music [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/09/bpm-and-soa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DNA evidence</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/dna-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/dna-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process & BPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often people ask me why I don&#8217;t like the use of DNA and other biological markers as identities. My answer can be expressed in two points: Biometric data cannot be repudiated. If your biometrics are compromised you cannot change them like you can do when your personal certificate (or password) is compromised. Biometric data are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/dna-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security is a strategic concern</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/security-is-a-strategic-concern/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/security-is-a-strategic-concern/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[References]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is an interesting point of view on security business today from an IBM Security Strategist: http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/081709-8-dirty-secrets-of-the.html Among the eight points some are tightly related to enterprise strategy and enterprise architecture. Points 2, 6 and 7 focus on external concerns, regulations and security product vendors, but  others may be summarized like this: what do I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/security-is-a-strategic-concern/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bruce Schneier on Risk Intuition</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/bruce-schneier-on-risk-intuition/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/bruce-schneier-on-risk-intuition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[References]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolutionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intuition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a very good post of security guru Bruce Schneier on how we as individuals are good at evaluating risks: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/08/risk_intuition.html. We often hear that people do not follow rules because they do not understand risks and Schneier shows us that the error is to forget that we do not live in a world [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/bruce-schneier-on-risk-intuition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get out of the immaturity model (part 2)</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/get-out-of-the-immaturity-model-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/get-out-of-the-immaturity-model-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blueprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-mindedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationaliztion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Part 1] Here are some points to focus on to try to get out of the immaturity model. Some are obvious. Some may sound like weird ideas. But do not underestimate culture: obvious points may not be obvious for everyone and weird things may well be weird only for those who see them for the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/get-out-of-the-immaturity-model-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get out of the immaturity model (part 1)</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/get-out-of-the-immaturity-model-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/get-out-of-the-immaturity-model-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blueprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-mindedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationaliztion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;IT is a young discipline&#8221; syndrome For as long as I have worked in IT I have heard this dogmatic explanation. It is used for all sorts of issues ranging from hardware failures to heavily bugged software including huge and astonishingly complex IT solutions without strong relations with business problems. Each time, the maturity idea [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/08/get-out-of-the-immaturity-model-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Innovation warning</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/05/innovation-warning/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/05/innovation-warning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just a quick note about a dreadful news: IT business is running short of trigrams. Trigrams are those nasty special words made of the three capital letters of some difficult to understand expression we traditionally use to attract interests in a new Graal. Running short of such beasts is a nightmar because without [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/05/innovation-warning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movies errors, a wish list</title>
		<link>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/03/movies-errors-a-wish-list/</link>
		<comments>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/03/movies-errors-a-wish-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fabien Villard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friends.praxeme.org/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lately I re-read a list of errors about computers [fr+en] (sorry for English readers, items are in English but comments are in French) found in movies. It&#8217;s not exactly the first time I&#8217;ve read such a list and it&#8217;s always amusing to see a collection of problems movie makers do about our domain, but this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://friends.praxeme.org/2009/03/movies-errors-a-wish-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

